The Grey Side of the Moon, a lunar security and governance tabletop simulation, brought together around 27 participants, including ambassadors and diplomats from states associated with both the Artemis Accords and the International Lunar Research Station, UN officials and specialists in space, security, cyber policy and law, to explore lunar security and governance. Delivered jointly by the Open Lunar Foundation and the Geneva Centre for Security Policy on 7 September 2026, alongside the UNIDIR Outer Space Security Conference, it was designed and facilitated by Samuel Jardine, with Simon Cleobury as co-facilitator. Supported by Expert Guides from Secure World Foundation, European Space Policy Institute, Leiden University, Georgia Institute of Technology, Project Ploughshares, and ETH Zurich, participants tested competing legal and political positions against realistic lunar operating constraints. Participants valued the exercise’s connection between diplomacy and practical lunar operations, and how it built an understanding around emerging lunar security and coordination challenges.
Published by the European Space Policy Institute, August 2026. Co-authored by Samuel Jardine (Open Lunar Foundation) and Therese Jones (ESPI). Findings from a tabletop in which four asymmetric actors established operations in the same area of the lunar south pole without agreed coordination arrangements.
This decision-logic toolkit examines coordination scenarios at high-traffic lunar south pole sites, applying a novel three-ring operational area framework to determine where and how cooperation is required. It offers lunar operators and policymakers a practical method for sizing operational areas and resolving overlap before conflicts arise.
Working to build shared lunar literacy by funding independent writing and convening open dialogue on how humanity returns to the Moon.
Open Lunar’s tabletop simulations translate complex lunar governance challenges into shared, actionable insight for the global space community.
Exploring an open-access model(s) that facilitates inclusive, peaceful exploration and development in line with Articles I and II of the Outer Space Treat.
Working to enable more reliable PNT services to support the growing need within lunar missions.
Working to advance sustainable lunar habitation through innovative life support systems.
Working to accelerate lunar development through standardized power solutions
Working to ensure safe and sustainable Lunar operations through a safety reporting system
Working to establish ethical standards for lunar payloads, promoting responsible space exploration.
Working to enable sustainable lunar exploration through collaborative landing infrastructure.
On 7 September 2026, the Open Lunar Foundation partnered with the Geneva Centre for Security Policy (GCSP) and the Global University Alliance for Outer Space Policy and Law Education (GUAOSPLE) to hold a Geneva Security Debate on lunar security and strategic competition, an emerging issue with increasing military interest globally on the Moon’s future and rhetoric regarding strategic competition over the Moon is rising. GCSP hosted the debate in Geneva on the sidelines of UNIDIR’s Outer Space Security Conference, and expert panellists were drawn from the United States, Europe and China to provide a range of perspectives on this topic and kick-start the conversation on how we ensure lunar security considerations are managed to ensure a peaceful, safe, and sustainable return to the Moon for all humanity.
ESPI has published a report on Surface Tensions, the tabletop Open Lunar convened on the sidelines of the 2026 UNCOPUOS Plenary. During the session, declared operational areas shaped behaviour without formal recognition, and a habitat announced publicly but absent from any shared operational picture was damaged by a rival's landing.
Artemis and ILRS operators share no common authority. This could concern some. Yet, Aaron Mackey argues they don't necessarily need one to coordinate safely on the lunar surface.